TSTP Solution File: NUM659^4 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : NUM659^4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 08:56:03 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :   36
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   81 (  40 unt;  21 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  333 (  94 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   63 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  737 ( 112   ~; 102   |;  14   &; 452   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  57  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   56 (  56   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   24 (  21 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  150 ( 106   ^  44   !;   0   ?; 150   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
    is_of: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    all_of: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_61,type,
    imp: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(decl_62,type,
    d_not: $o > $o ).

thf(decl_67,type,
    l_or: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(decl_71,type,
    non: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_72,type,
    l_some: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_77,type,
    e_is: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_123,type,
    nat: $i ).

thf(decl_124,type,
    n_is: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_127,type,
    n_some: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_142,type,
    n_pl: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_147,type,
    diffprop: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_148,type,
    d_29_ii: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_149,type,
    iii: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_152,type,
    lessis: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_153,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

thf(decl_154,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

thf(decl_159,type,
    esk7_2: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_160,type,
    esk8_2: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(def_all_of,axiom,
    ( all_of
    = ( ^ [X3: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] :
        ! [X4: $i] :
          ( ( is_of @ X4 @ X3 )
         => ( X2 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jRMG5ZyTbM/E---3.1_16006.p',def_all_of) ).

thf(def_is_of,axiom,
    ( is_of
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X2: $i > $o] : ( X2 @ X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jRMG5ZyTbM/E---3.1_16006.p',def_is_of) ).

thf(def_d_not,axiom,
    ( d_not
    = ( ^ [X76: $o] : ( imp @ X76 @ ~ $true ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jRMG5ZyTbM/E---3.1_16006.p',def_d_not) ).

thf(def_imp,axiom,
    ( imp
    = ( ^ [X74: $o,X75: $o] :
          ( X74
         => X75 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jRMG5ZyTbM/E---3.1_16006.p',def_imp) ).

thf(def_e_is,axiom,
    ( e_is
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X101: $i,X102: $i] : ( X101 = X102 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jRMG5ZyTbM/E---3.1_16006.p',def_e_is) ).

thf(def_l_some,axiom,
    ( l_some
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X2: $i > $o] :
          ( d_not
          @ ( all_of
            @ ^ [X4: $i] : ( in @ X4 @ X1 )
            @ ( non @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jRMG5ZyTbM/E---3.1_16006.p',def_l_some) ).

thf(def_diffprop,axiom,
    ( diffprop
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X207: $i,X4: $i] : ( n_is @ X1 @ ( n_pl @ X207 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jRMG5ZyTbM/E---3.1_16006.p',def_diffprop) ).

thf(def_n_is,axiom,
    ( n_is
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = Z1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jRMG5ZyTbM/E---3.1_16006.p',def_n_is) ).

thf(def_l_or,axiom,
    ( l_or
    = ( ^ [X83: $o] : ( imp @ ( d_not @ X83 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jRMG5ZyTbM/E---3.1_16006.p',def_l_or) ).

thf(def_iii,axiom,
    ( iii
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X211: $i] : ( n_some @ ( diffprop @ X211 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jRMG5ZyTbM/E---3.1_16006.p',def_iii) ).

thf(def_n_some,axiom,
    ( n_some
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o] :
          ( ! [X307: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X307 @ nat )
             => ( non @ nat @ Z0 @ X307 ) )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jRMG5ZyTbM/E---3.1_16006.p',def_n_some) ).

thf(def_lessis,axiom,
    ( lessis
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X230: $i] : ( l_or @ ( iii @ X1 @ X230 ) @ ( n_is @ X1 @ X230 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jRMG5ZyTbM/E---3.1_16006.p',def_lessis) ).

thf(def_d_29_ii,axiom,
    ( d_29_ii
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X210: $i] : ( n_some @ ( diffprop @ X1 @ X210 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jRMG5ZyTbM/E---3.1_16006.p',def_d_29_ii) ).

thf(satz10e,axiom,
    ( all_of
    @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( in @ X1 @ nat )
    @ ^ [X1: $i] :
        ( all_of
        @ ^ [X239: $i] : ( in @ X239 @ nat )
        @ ^ [X240: $i] :
            ( ( d_not @ ( d_29_ii @ X1 @ X240 ) )
           => ( lessis @ X1 @ X240 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jRMG5ZyTbM/E---3.1_16006.p',satz10e) ).

thf(satz10k,conjecture,
    ( all_of
    @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( in @ X1 @ nat )
    @ ^ [X1: $i] :
        ( all_of
        @ ^ [X249: $i] : ( in @ X249 @ nat )
        @ ^ [X250: $i] :
            ( ( d_not @ ( lessis @ X1 @ X250 ) )
           => ( d_29_ii @ X1 @ X250 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jRMG5ZyTbM/E---3.1_16006.p',satz10k) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( all_of
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o] :
        ! [X4: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ X4 )
         => ( Z1 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_all_of]) ).

thf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( is_of
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i > $o] : ( Z1 @ Z0 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_is_of]) ).

thf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( d_not
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o] :
          ( Z0
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_d_not]) ).

thf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( imp
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o,Z1: $o] :
          ( Z0
         => Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_imp]) ).

thf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( e_is
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i,Z2: $i] : ( Z1 = Z2 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_e_is]) ).

thf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( l_some
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i > $o] :
          ( ! [X306: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X306 @ Z0 )
             => ( non @ Z0 @ Z1 @ X306 ) )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_l_some]) ).

thf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( all_of
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o] :
        ! [X4: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ X4 )
         => ( Z1 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

thf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( d_not
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o] :
          ( Z0
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( diffprop
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i,Z2: $i] :
          ( Z0
          = ( n_pl @ Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_diffprop]) ).

thf(c_0_24,axiom,
    ( n_is
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_n_is,c_0_19]) ).

thf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( l_some
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i > $o] :
          ( ! [X306: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X306 @ Z0 )
             => ( non @ Z0 @ Z1 @ X306 ) )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).

thf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( l_or
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o,Z1: $o] :
          ( ( Z0
           => ~ $true )
         => Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_l_or]) ).

thf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( iii
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( ! [X309: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X309 @ nat )
             => ( non @ nat
                @ ^ [Z2: $i] :
                    ( Z1
                    = ( n_pl @ Z0 @ Z2 ) )
                @ X309 ) )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_iii]) ).

thf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( diffprop
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i,Z2: $i] :
          ( Z0
          = ( n_pl @ Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

thf(c_0_29,axiom,
    ( n_some
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o] :
          ( ! [X307: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X307 @ nat )
             => ( non @ nat @ Z0 @ X307 ) )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_n_some,c_0_25]) ).

thf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( lessis
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( ( ( ! [X311: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ X311 @ nat )
                 => ( non @ nat
                    @ ^ [Z2: $i] :
                        ( Z1
                        = ( n_pl @ Z0 @ Z2 ) )
                    @ X311 ) )
             => ~ $true )
           => ~ $true )
         => ( Z0 = Z1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_lessis]) ).

thf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( l_or
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o,Z1: $o] :
          ( ( Z0
           => ~ $true )
         => Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_18]),c_0_22]) ).

thf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( iii
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( ! [X309: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X309 @ nat )
             => ( non @ nat
                @ ^ [Z2: $i] :
                    ( Z1
                    = ( n_pl @ Z0 @ Z2 ) )
                @ X309 ) )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]) ).

thf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( d_29_ii
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( ! [X308: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X308 @ nat )
             => ( non @ nat
                @ ^ [Z2: $i] :
                    ( Z0
                    = ( n_pl @ Z1 @ Z2 ) )
                @ X308 ) )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_d_29_ii]) ).

thf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( lessis
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( ( ( ! [X311: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ X311 @ nat )
                 => ( non @ nat
                    @ ^ [Z2: $i] :
                        ( Z1
                        = ( n_pl @ Z0 @ Z2 ) )
                    @ X311 ) )
             => ~ $true )
           => ~ $true )
         => ( Z0 = Z1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_24]),c_0_31]),c_0_32]) ).

thf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( d_29_ii
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( ! [X308: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X308 @ nat )
             => ( non @ nat
                @ ^ [Z2: $i] :
                    ( Z0
                    = ( n_pl @ Z1 @ Z2 ) )
                @ X308 ) )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_28]),c_0_29]) ).

thf(c_0_36,plain,
    ! [X339: $i] :
      ( ( in @ X339 @ nat )
     => ! [X338: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X338 @ nat )
         => ( ( ( ! [X336: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ X336 @ nat )
                   => ( non @ nat
                      @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                          ( X339
                          = ( n_pl @ X338 @ Z0 ) )
                      @ X336 ) )
               => ~ $true )
             => ~ $true )
           => ( ( ( ! [X337: $i] :
                      ( ( in @ X337 @ nat )
                     => ( non @ nat
                        @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                            ( X338
                            = ( n_pl @ X339 @ Z0 ) )
                        @ X337 ) )
                 => ~ $true )
               => ~ $true )
             => ( X339 = X338 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satz10e]),c_0_21]),c_0_34]),c_0_22]),c_0_35]) ).

thf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X315: $i] :
        ( ( in @ X315 @ nat )
       => ! [X314: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X314 @ nat )
           => ( ( ( ( ( ! [X312: $i] :
                          ( ( in @ X312 @ nat )
                         => ( non @ nat
                            @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                                ( X314
                                = ( n_pl @ X315 @ Z0 ) )
                            @ X312 ) )
                     => ~ $true )
                   => ~ $true )
                 => ( X315 = X314 ) )
               => ~ $true )
             => ( ! [X313: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ X313 @ nat )
                   => ( non @ nat
                      @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                          ( X315
                          = ( n_pl @ X314 @ Z0 ) )
                      @ X313 ) )
               => ~ $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz10k])]),c_0_21]),c_0_34]),c_0_22]),c_0_35]) ).

thf(c_0_38,plain,
    ! [X458: $i,X459: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ ( esk8_2 @ X458 @ X459 ) @ nat )
        | ~ $true
        | ( X458 = X459 )
        | ( in @ ( esk7_2 @ X458 @ X459 ) @ nat )
        | ~ $true
        | ~ ( in @ X459 @ nat )
        | ~ ( in @ X458 @ nat ) )
      & ( ~ ( non @ nat
            @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                ( X459
                = ( n_pl @ X458 @ Z0 ) )
            @ ( esk8_2 @ X458 @ X459 ) )
        | ~ $true
        | ( X458 = X459 )
        | ( in @ ( esk7_2 @ X458 @ X459 ) @ nat )
        | ~ $true
        | ~ ( in @ X459 @ nat )
        | ~ ( in @ X458 @ nat ) )
      & ( $true
        | ( X458 = X459 )
        | ( in @ ( esk7_2 @ X458 @ X459 ) @ nat )
        | ~ $true
        | ~ ( in @ X459 @ nat )
        | ~ ( in @ X458 @ nat ) )
      & ( ( in @ ( esk8_2 @ X458 @ X459 ) @ nat )
        | ~ $true
        | ( X458 = X459 )
        | ~ ( non @ nat
            @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                ( X458
                = ( n_pl @ X459 @ Z0 ) )
            @ ( esk7_2 @ X458 @ X459 ) )
        | ~ $true
        | ~ ( in @ X459 @ nat )
        | ~ ( in @ X458 @ nat ) )
      & ( ~ ( non @ nat
            @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                ( X459
                = ( n_pl @ X458 @ Z0 ) )
            @ ( esk8_2 @ X458 @ X459 ) )
        | ~ $true
        | ( X458 = X459 )
        | ~ ( non @ nat
            @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                ( X458
                = ( n_pl @ X459 @ Z0 ) )
            @ ( esk7_2 @ X458 @ X459 ) )
        | ~ $true
        | ~ ( in @ X459 @ nat )
        | ~ ( in @ X458 @ nat ) )
      & ( $true
        | ( X458 = X459 )
        | ~ ( non @ nat
            @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                ( X458
                = ( n_pl @ X459 @ Z0 ) )
            @ ( esk7_2 @ X458 @ X459 ) )
        | ~ $true
        | ~ ( in @ X459 @ nat )
        | ~ ( in @ X458 @ nat ) )
      & ( ( in @ ( esk8_2 @ X458 @ X459 ) @ nat )
        | ~ $true
        | ( X458 = X459 )
        | $true
        | ~ ( in @ X459 @ nat )
        | ~ ( in @ X458 @ nat ) )
      & ( ~ ( non @ nat
            @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                ( X459
                = ( n_pl @ X458 @ Z0 ) )
            @ ( esk8_2 @ X458 @ X459 ) )
        | ~ $true
        | ( X458 = X459 )
        | $true
        | ~ ( in @ X459 @ nat )
        | ~ ( in @ X458 @ nat ) )
      & ( $true
        | ( X458 = X459 )
        | $true
        | ~ ( in @ X459 @ nat )
        | ~ ( in @ X458 @ nat ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_36])])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X436: $i,X437: $i] :
      ( ( in @ esk1_0 @ nat )
      & ( in @ esk2_0 @ nat )
      & ( ~ ( in @ X436 @ nat )
        | ( non @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
              ( esk2_0
              = ( n_pl @ esk1_0 @ Z0 ) )
          @ X436 )
        | ~ $true
        | ~ $true )
      & ( $true
        | ~ $true
        | ~ $true )
      & ( ( esk1_0 != esk2_0 )
        | ~ $true )
      & ( ~ ( in @ X437 @ nat )
        | ( non @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
              ( esk1_0
              = ( n_pl @ esk2_0 @ Z0 ) )
          @ X437 ) )
      & $true ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_37])])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_40,plain,
    ! [X1: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( ( X4 = X1 )
      | ( in @ ( esk7_2 @ X4 @ X1 ) @ nat )
      | ~ ( non @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
              ( X1
              = ( n_pl @ X4 @ Z0 ) )
          @ ( esk8_2 @ X4 @ X1 ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X4 @ nat ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]) ).

thf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk1_0 != esk2_0 )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]) ).

thf(c_0_42,plain,
    ! [X4: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X4 )
      | ( in @ ( esk7_2 @ X4 @ X1 ) @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X4 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ nat )
      | ~ ( non @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
              ( X1
              = ( n_pl @ X4 @ Z0 ) )
          @ ( esk8_2 @ X4 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]) ).

thf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( non @ nat
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
            ( esk1_0
            = ( n_pl @ esk2_0 @ Z0 ) )
        @ X1 )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ nat ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]) ).

thf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    in @ esk2_0 @ nat,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]) ).

thf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    in @ esk1_0 @ nat,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]) ).

thf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 != esk1_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).

thf(c_0_47,plain,
    ! [X4: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( in @ ( esk8_2 @ X1 @ X4 ) @ nat )
      | ( X1 = X4 )
      | ( in @ ( esk7_2 @ X1 @ X4 ) @ nat )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( in @ X4 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ nat ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]) ).

thf(c_0_48,plain,
    ! [X1: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( ( X4 = X1 )
      | ~ ( non @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
              ( X1
              = ( n_pl @ X4 @ Z0 ) )
          @ ( esk8_2 @ X4 @ X1 ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( non @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
              ( X4
              = ( n_pl @ X1 @ Z0 ) )
          @ ( esk7_2 @ X4 @ X1 ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X4 @ nat ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]) ).

thf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( non @ nat
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
            ( esk2_0
            = ( n_pl @ esk1_0 @ Z0 ) )
        @ X1 )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ nat )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]) ).

thf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( in @ ( esk7_2 @ esk2_0 @ esk1_0 ) @ nat )
    | ~ ( in @ ( esk8_2 @ esk2_0 @ esk1_0 ) @ nat ) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]),c_0_44]),c_0_45])]),c_0_46]) ).

thf(c_0_51,plain,
    ! [X4: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X4 )
      | ( in @ ( esk7_2 @ X1 @ X4 ) @ nat )
      | ( in @ ( esk8_2 @ X1 @ X4 ) @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X4 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ nat ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_47]) ).

thf(c_0_52,plain,
    ! [X4: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( in @ ( esk8_2 @ X1 @ X4 ) @ nat )
      | ( X1 = X4 )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( non @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
              ( X1
              = ( n_pl @ X4 @ Z0 ) )
          @ ( esk7_2 @ X1 @ X4 ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( in @ X4 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ nat ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]) ).

thf(c_0_53,plain,
    ! [X4: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X4 )
      | ~ ( in @ X4 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ nat )
      | ~ ( non @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
              ( X4
              = ( n_pl @ X1 @ Z0 ) )
          @ ( esk7_2 @ X4 @ X1 ) )
      | ~ ( non @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
              ( X1
              = ( n_pl @ X4 @ Z0 ) )
          @ ( esk8_2 @ X4 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_48]) ).

thf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( non @ nat
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
            ( esk2_0
            = ( n_pl @ esk1_0 @ Z0 ) )
        @ X1 )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ nat ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_49]) ).

thf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    in @ ( esk7_2 @ esk2_0 @ esk1_0 ) @ nat,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]),c_0_45]),c_0_44])]),c_0_46]) ).

thf(c_0_56,plain,
    ! [X1: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X4 )
      | ( in @ ( esk8_2 @ X1 @ X4 ) @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X4 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ nat )
      | ~ ( non @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
              ( X1
              = ( n_pl @ X4 @ Z0 ) )
          @ ( esk7_2 @ X1 @ X4 ) ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_52]) ).

thf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( non @ nat
      @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
          ( esk1_0
          = ( n_pl @ esk2_0 @ Z0 ) )
      @ ( esk8_2 @ esk2_0 @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]),c_0_44]),c_0_45]),c_0_55])]),c_0_46]) ).

thf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
    in @ ( esk8_2 @ esk2_0 @ esk1_0 ) @ nat,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_54]),c_0_45]),c_0_44])]),c_0_46]),c_0_55])]) ).

thf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_43]),c_0_58])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.12  % Problem    : NUM659^4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.1.0.
% 0.02/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 08:49:51 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.46  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jRMG5ZyTbM/E---3.1_16006.p
% 0.18/0.53  # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.18/0.53  # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA.
% 0.18/0.53  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting lpo1_fix with 900s (3) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting full_lambda_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting almost_fo_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting new_ho_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting pre_casc_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # pre_casc_4 with pid 16088 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Result found by pre_casc_4
% 0.18/0.53  # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA.
% 0.18/0.53  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting lpo1_fix with 900s (3) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting full_lambda_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting almost_fo_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting new_ho_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting pre_casc_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.5,0,3,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.18/0.53  # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM31-DHSMMSBN
% 0.18/0.53  # partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM31-MHSMMSBN
% 0.18/0.53  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 157s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 16090 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
% 0.18/0.53  # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA.
% 0.18/0.53  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting lpo1_fix with 900s (3) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting full_lambda_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting almost_fo_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting new_ho_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting pre_casc_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.5,0,3,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.18/0.53  # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM31-DHSMMSBN
% 0.18/0.53  # partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM31-MHSMMSBN
% 0.18/0.53  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 157s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.53  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.53  
% 0.18/0.53  # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.53  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.53  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.53  # Parsed axioms                        : 358
% 0.18/0.53  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 273
% 0.18/0.53  # Initial clauses                      : 203
% 0.18/0.53  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 73
% 0.18/0.53  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 130
% 0.18/0.53  # Processed clauses                    : 351
% 0.18/0.53  # ...of these trivial                  : 5
% 0.18/0.53  # ...subsumed                          : 36
% 0.18/0.53  # ...remaining for further processing  : 310
% 0.18/0.53  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 15
% 0.18/0.53  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Backward-rewritten                   : 11
% 0.18/0.53  # Generated clauses                    : 641
% 0.18/0.53  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 609
% 0.18/0.53  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Paramodulations                      : 618
% 0.18/0.53  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.18/0.53  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Equation resolutions                 : 17
% 0.18/0.53  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Total rewrite steps                  : 182
% 0.18/0.53  # ...of those cached                   : 152
% 0.18/0.53  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.18/0.53  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.18/0.53  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.53  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.18/0.53  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.53  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.18/0.53  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.18/0.53  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.18/0.53  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.18/0.53  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.18/0.53  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.18/0.53  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.18/0.53  # Current number of processed clauses  : 181
% 0.18/0.53  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 43
% 0.18/0.53  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.53  #    Negative unit clauses             : 34
% 0.18/0.53  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 104
% 0.18/0.53  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 496
% 0.18/0.53  # ...number of literals in the above   : 2416
% 0.18/0.53  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Current number of archived clauses   : 124
% 0.18/0.53  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8194
% 0.18/0.53  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1039
% 0.18/0.53  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 26
% 0.18/0.53  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1487
% 0.18/0.53  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 16
% 0.18/0.53  # BW rewrite match successes           : 10
% 0.18/0.53  # Condensation attempts                : 351
% 0.18/0.53  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 52147
% 0.18/0.53  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 10724
% 0.18/0.53  
% 0.18/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.53  # User time                : 0.044 s
% 0.18/0.53  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.53  # Total time               : 0.050 s
% 0.18/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 3684 pages
% 0.18/0.53  
% 0.18/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.53  # User time                : 0.051 s
% 0.18/0.53  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.18/0.53  # Total time               : 0.060 s
% 0.18/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 2252 pages
% 0.18/0.53  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.18/0.53  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------